A selection of recent mentions of 乐播传媒 faculty in the news, from a glowing review of a new poetry collection to economic analysis of a big move by Samsung and an exploration of what The New York Times describes as still “taboo” for many women.


Ther铆 Pickens

‘A powerful exploration of storytelling and Black experiences’ 鈥 Library Journal
poetry book cover
What Had Happened Was is due out March 25 ,

What Had Happened Was, the debut poetry collection by Charles A. Dana Professor of English and Africana Ther铆 Alyce Pickens, in February, which described the book as a 鈥減owerful exploration of storytelling and Black experiences.鈥

What Had Happened Was is due out March 25 , which also published Pickens鈥 2019 book Black Madness :: Mad Blackness, an examination of Blackness and disability.

Her poetry collection addresses topics ranging from Black life, popular culture, and history to individual encounters with emotional, love, and chronic disability. Pickens weaves in mentions of Li鈥檒 Kim and memories of the ’90s sitcom The Fresh Prince of Bel Air, then turns to subjects such as Harriet Tubman and Breonna Taylor.

In her review for Library Journal, Jessica Calaway called the poem titled “On March 12, 2020, Breonna Taylor” 鈥渟triking鈥 and an invitation to readers to 鈥渞eflect on Taylor鈥檚 legacy and broader implications.鈥 The full review is available only to subscribers, but here are some excerpts:

photo of a person
An award-winning scholar, Ther铆 Pickens is the Charles A. Dana Professor of English and Africana. (Photograph by Sharyn Peavey)

“The collection鈥檚 strength lies in its content and form. Through intentional sentence structures 鈥攈yphens, periods, or strategic placement of text on the page 鈥 the collection encourages readers to pause and absorb the gravity of historical moments. Pickens employs a variety of styles, yet all her poems share a common thread: they create a space for reflection.鈥

And Library Journal鈥檚 鈥渧erdict鈥? Pickens鈥 poetry is essential:

“This collection demands attention and introspection by offering a raw yet eloquent portrayal of the intersections of history, identity, and systemic oppression. It鈥檚 an essential read for people seeking to honor the complexity of the experiences of Black Americans.鈥

An on-campus reading, Q&A, and book signing for What Had Happened Was is planned for Thursday, April 3.


Rebecca Herzig

Is facial hair the last taboo in women鈥檚 beauty? 鈥 The New York Times

A story in The New York Times for insights into historical assumptions made about women of color with facial hair.

book cover
It鈥檚 been 10 years since Plucked was published, but Rebecca Herzig says she鈥檚 still astonished by how 鈥渞egularly I am contacted on this topic, from all corners of the world.”

The Times had asked female readers to respond to a questionnaire about their relationship with their facial hair. Almost 900 people responded and while some described pacts they鈥檇 made with friends to pluck each other鈥檚 facial hair into their dotage, when they were no longer able to care for themselves, others spoke of embracing what occurs naturally.

Writer Charlie Brinkhurst-Cuff described some cultural changes around this 鈥渓ast taboo鈥:

鈥淭his century, a shift of sorts has emerged around the norms of women鈥檚 bodies. There have been multiple movements, such as ‘Januhairy,’ which encouraged women to grow their body hair, including facial hair, during the month of January (the community鈥檚 official Instagram account has 42,000 followers).”

Brinkhurst-Cuff references Rosalie, a 2023 French film that featured a bearded female protagonist, and quotes its director: 鈥淚 invented the story of a young woman who frees herself by embracing her beard,鈥 said the film鈥檚 director, St茅phanie di Gusto. 鈥淲ith Rosalie鈥檚 beard, I wanted to reinvent femininity.鈥

Brinkhurst-Cuff also draws on Herzig鈥檚 research in Plucked: A History of Hair Removal to discuss how women’s facial hair has been associated with “madness, degeneracy, and 鈥榠nferior races.鈥欌

It鈥檚 been 10 years since Plucked was published, but Herzig still fields regular inquiries from journalists and students working on related topics. “It’s sort of astonishing,” she says.


Paul Shea

Samsung bought back $2 billion of its own shares. Now it鈥檚 canceling them entirely 鈥 Marketplace

Why do companies sometimes cancel (and then buy back) their own stock? Dowling Family Professor of Economics Paul Shea was among prominent economists who explain to Marketplace , including being able to avoid higher taxes.

鈥淚nvestors have a reason to prefer share cancellations to, say, offering a dividend,” Shea said. 鈥淵ou don鈥檛 pay a dividend tax rate on it. You pay a capital gains tax rate, which is lower for most people.鈥

Paul Shea, Dowling Family Professor of Economics, poses for a portrait in his Pettengill  270 office on Oct.2, 2024.
Paul Shea, the Dowling Family Professor of Economics, explained to Marketplace what the rationale might have been for Samsung repurchasing $2 billion of its shares.(Phyllis Graber Jensen/乐播传媒 College)

But, Shea said, the billions of dollars that Samsung spent to buy the shares it鈥檚 canceling means it鈥檚 not spending money on growth, like building new plants or acquiring other companies. 鈥淪o that could be a negative signal, but it could also just be that this is not a time where there鈥檚 great opportunity for expansion,鈥 Shea told Marketplace:

鈥淪hea said the cancellations would make him more nervous for a younger company that鈥檚 never turned a profit. With an older, more stable company like Samsung, he said there鈥檚 nothing wrong with returning money to shareholders this way.鈥


Paul Schofield

APA announces Fall 2024 prize winners 鈥 American Philosophical Association
Associate Professor of Philosophy Paul Schofield is working on a book about the unique injustice of homelessness, an area of scholarship that stems back to volunteer work during the pandemic.
乐播传媒 philosophy professor Paul Schofield is working on a book about the unique injustice of homelessness.

Associate Professor of Philosophy Paul Schofield was recently honored by the American Philosophical Association for an op-ed he published in The Conversation, titled 鈥淏eing Homeless Means Not Being Free 鈥 As Americans Are Supposed to Be.鈥

Schofield was one of of five philosophers honored by the association鈥檚 committee on public philosophy in the Public Philosophy Op-Ed Contest, which goes to up to five philosophers who write standout pieces that 鈥渟uccessfully blend philosophical argumentation with an op-ed writing style.鈥

In his prize-winning essay, .”

For example, he writes, “a person who is homeless and sleeps on a public bench will often be told by the police to move. Someone who sets up a tent on a sidewalk will usually have it confiscated. Someone who urinates or defecates in a park can be arrested.

“Now you can see why some think that homelessness compromises a person鈥檚 freedom. Sleeping and relieving oneself are necessary, life-sustaining tasks…. Given the way society protects private property and regulates public spaces, it seems that people who are homeless are left with no space at all in which they are free to do the things they need to do in order to live.”