Comments on: Joyce White Vance ’82: Whatever Mueller report says, rule of law stands strong

By: 4Justice

4Justice — Sat, 27 Jul 2019 00:12:00 +0000

How much money do you earn to spew your garbage?
Better hurry and get all the gigs in you can, because you are about to be out of business, AND proven a fairytale teller.
Do your homework. The entire fiasco was a corrupt attack on our POTUS the left STILL won’t admit won fair and square.
Will your next money making talks explain to us how the O administration set the entire thing in action?
Will you switch sides to keep the money flowing?

By: David Ehrenthal

David Ehrenthal — Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:40:00 +0000

Joyce, so nice to see you in action. You were a great classmate at �ֲ��ý and I always knew your inquisitive and collaborative mindset would be of great benefit to many. I’m writing this the day after Barr issued his four-page memorandum, somewhat relieved that the Trump administration was simply opportunistic and unethical versus acting as a compromised agent for a foreign power. As much as I disagree with the vast majority of this administration’s directives and behavior, which seem to be driven by special financial interests aka billionaire families and defensive cultural agendas, I’m glad to get back to real issues after nearly two years of the Russia probe. Time will tell whether this is the case. The case against this administration is primarily one of economic and foreign policy incompetence and uncivilized leadership, and it will be more effective to turn the page through the ballot box – assuming, of course, that the gerrymandering tactics, advertising campaigns/agitation propaganda funded by billionaire families and other cheating tactics employed by today’s Republican party do not interfere with a fair, democratic outcome. Much damage has surely been inflicted on our reputation and moral standards and it will take generations for European leaders and the like to trust the US again, not to mention the time lost on global warming.

By: G. Vanderleun

G. Vanderleun — Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:09:00 +0000

“It’s also possible that the president or those close to him did something wrong, but something that’s not grounds for prosecution or even impeachment — “awful but lawful,” Vance called it. In that case, if it offends the sensibilities of enough Americans, it’s up to the voters to remove the president in 2020.” Translation: ZIP ZERO NADA but this bint doesn’t want to admit it.

By: Ted MIlls

Ted MIlls — Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:45:00 +0000

I have only skimmed the article and will study it further, but for the past 6 years of so I have been researching, studying and writing a book, “How Bill Clinton, the Federal Reserve and Congress Caused the Housing and Global Financial Crises.” What became clear is that the subprime crisis WOULD NOT have occurred BUT FOR the strong academic and media support for the policies that created both crises. Included are two chapters on the “Colossal Russian Collusion and Confusion – Or How Smoke Gets In Your Eyes.” The whole investigation rests on an entirely unsubstantiated and unsubstantiatable Steele Dossier. The question becomes:- , while unsubstantiatable allegations may be sufficient to warrant an UNOBTRUSIVE investigation. can they justify a deeply intrusive investigation involving a grand jury, warrants, etc? The facts of this case cry out for a Supreme Court hearing on the extent that a FISA warrant was justified in the first place and whether the extent of the investigation can pass constitutional muster, particularly in light of substantial evidence of FBI and DOJ animus toward President Trump?

Edward E. Mills; ’57 JD, MBA CFA