Television Research

Blockbuster or cult favorite? ÌýIn the world of television production, it’s all in the numbers, and the ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ Library has them for you.

Television research is like a CSI episode. ÌýThe culprit can hide in communication, sociology, psychology, and just about any other type of database. ÌýGive yourself time and search systematically; you’ll find everything you need to make your case.Ìý

The Nielsen Ratings provide rich data on the numbers and types of viewers that watch television — over-the-air, cable, and most recently via DVR delay. ÌýWhile even highly restricted access to the raw data from The Nielsen Company can cost many thousands of dollars per year, ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ has ready access to those Nielsen data that are reported in entertainment industry publications.

At ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½, the most complete source for Nielsen Ratings is a publication called “Daily Variety.” ÌýWhile there is some access to this publication in news databases like Lexis/Nexis and Campus Research, those resources will lack any graphics or charts that are used to make the ratings understandable. Instead you should use . Ìý(If you don’t want to come back to this blog post all the time, you can find it in the ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½ library catalog or in the alphabetical list of databases.)

can be searched like other EBSCO databases. ÌýJust type a few words in one of the three search boxes. Ìý**Remember: if you use quotes, it will keep your words together in a phrase:

This search yields 1400+ articles, but — as you might imagine — quite a few have titles like “The Eye Doctor Who Makes House Calls.” ÌýNot quite what we need. ÌýAdd the term ‘Nielsen’ on the second line. ÌýNow all eight articles the database finds are about Jerri Nielsen, the doctor who had to be rescued from the South Pole:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This doesn’t mean that no one watches our “Doctor Who,” it just means that we need to use different terminology. ÌýLet’s try the term ‘audience OR viewers’ (no quotes, but do capitalize OR).

This returns 40 articles, and they include information like this: “He states the program gained more viewersÌýin 2010 when Matt Smith took over the lead role, as it attracted 1.2 millionÌýviewersÌýin its season premiere.” This is information that is derived from a Nielsen report. It’s just that it’s not phrased in their standard format, and they are not cited. ÌýDon’t ignore titles that would seem to be off topic. ÌýThe article “RNC viewers went AWOL” from USA Today on September 6, 2012 has the tidbit of information “Record setting. BBC America’sÌýDoctorÌýWhoÌýopener (1.6 million Saturday) set a channel record…”Ìý This doesn’t give us exact Nielsen Ratings, but we have a number that we can compare.

If you do want to see the Nielsen Ratings, so that you can gauge how your show compares to the ones that did make the charts, it’s simple. ÌýChange the first search box to ‘variety’ and the second search box to ‘nielsen ratings’ (no quotes in either one). ÌýFor this search, the best organization of the articles returned is by Date Descending. That way you can zero in on reports for the weeks that your show aired:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For instance, the latest season of Doctor Who premiered in the US on the Saturday of Labor Day weekend. ÌýSo If I look at the charts from that weekend, I can see what other channels were airing at 9PM Eastern on Saturday.

Finally, you see some numbers. Ìýthe seventh season of Doctor Who premier against the Auburn/Michigan football game — the highest ranked program for the entire week, with 7.92 million viewers, and a Nielsen Rating of 3.0/11. ÌýBut of potentially more concern to the Doctor Who researcher are the crime and mystery programs that are also airing in that 9-10 PM slot. ÌýEven though they are repeats — indicated by the (R) — there may be more potential for a crossover audience with these programs:

 

Finally, when all of your resources are used up in MasterFILE Premier, remember to click “Choose Databases” and “Select all.” ÌýNow you can do those searches all over again. ÌýYou WILL find more!